The Compendium: Towards a Unified Model of Everything.

“The Compendium:  Towards a Unified Model of Everything.


.By Herb Wiggins, M.D.; Clinical Neurosciences; Discoverer/Creator of the Comparison Process/CP Theory/Model; 14 Mar. 2014;  Copyright © 20 November 2020   


.The Basic 5 Fold Way


.Essentially, we must learn to overcome our built in limits and constraints. Have stated this many times before, and esp. in the Kategoria of the Incompletenesses.


.https://jochesh00.wordpress.com/2019/08/05/the-kategoria-of-the-incompletenesses/

.https://jochesh00.wordpress.com/2019/06/06/the-break-outs-roots-of-growth-unlimited-creativities/

.Among these are many. many implicit and thus largely unrecognized limits, which are very serious, because they have NOT been widely understood, seen, nor addressed   Often this is the linearity of our thinking. That is, the counting, the maths, and the logics. Those are either/or, true/false, A or not A, only A or B. The rich false dichotomies of formal logics, where logic eats itself very likely, like the worm of Ouroboros. & which cannot be complete. Binary thinking isn’t that good. Expressing all in terms of 0 or 1 cannot describe the universe very well. This is a built in, structural, nearly hidden limit. Our genetics uses a quaternary structure, DNA of 4 base pairs effectively do create the most survivable systems known, living systems. Thus we must use at least a quaternary system to describe most everything.


https://jochesh00.wordpress.com/2016/07/10/the-limits-to-linear-thinking-methods/

.

DNA is a universal info storer, and with RNA processors/creators of living systems. It has likely survived billions of years. Thus the Complex System(CxSys) of Not linear, but CxSys thinking; the rejection of the absolutes, the rejections of using linear systems only, & instead the adoption of S/F relationships, and all of that mediated by the Comparison Process (CP) and the Least Energy (LE) rules of the Second Law.

.


That provides the complexities and capabilities to far, far better understand likely what’s going on both inside of us, our brains/minds. And events on the outside. Thus a more Universal, unifying model of most everything. But not quite…..

.

The “Structure of our Colour Vision  2” article shows this uniquely & clearly.  The linear shape of the EM spectrum of the colors and frequencies of light is very, very not complete. Neither white, nor grays, not black, nor browns are there.  There are no colour combinations at all. Most all of the visible colours are thus ignored. & Oversimplified out of consideration.  So this kind of linearity is a very serious problem. & enlightens us to the problems of linear thinking. Comparisons of our colour vision, what we actually see & the visible light of the EM spectrum, exposes these implicit, deep biases and errors.  This is a verbal, visual disproof of the validity of logic. The False dichotomy of logic defeats the universal value & applicability of logic. Only A & not A is incompatible with the empirical events of the universe. Godel’s Incompleteness Theorem is likely the case.

.
.https://jochesh00.wordpress.com/2016/06/16/the-structure-of-color-vision-2/

.

.

.The universe of events is NOT linear, nor can it be, and any attempt to put all of it on the Procrustean bed of measuring, counting line is doomed to quick failure. It’s useful, but NOT complete. And the most complete description of colours, are again, the hierarchical paint chips in our paint stores. They show this richly and hopefully not under incandescent lights, or worse, Hg vapor lights, either.  It won’t match against the universal sunlight as the standard.  Almost all of the richness of the visible colours and combinations (also missed by EM spectrum), including Day Glo.  Not much of colours are found on the EM spectrum, Instead the rich mixes of grays, and colours very likely are the case.  Logical form? It’s true, hardly complete, & thus not that useful in real life past a certain point.

.


Likewise the sound spectrum is linear and misses a very great deal of what actually exists in complex sounds. The rich harmonies, the combinations of sounds, full spectrum of our symphonies. The ignoring of overtones and how voices can be rich for singing, and also individualizing, allowing us to recognize a voice specifically amidst all the other 1000’s of persons, often uniquely. Again, linearity missing richness and very, very not complete, as well. QED. The incredibly richness of the voices of most all of the musical instruments, not ignoring that one of the richest, the human voice.
Thus the limits of this linearity are visually made real and to be avoided. The number line, and linear logics are way too limited to create a complete understanding of what’s going on with visual events in existence. Thus they cannot easily create, estimate, or approximate a near Universal, unified model.

.
This leads to the next great find. Einstein searched for this as have many others. He had an inkling of it with his simplification methods, which are TD (Thermodynamic), LE paths, but never stated, nor likely realized that. If we want a Universal, unified model, then we must find and use the most universal processors of information created and processed in our brains. And that’s how it’s done. CP which finds the LE guidances in most all processes in our universe. Then Structure/Function, S/F methods. Then trial and error and sorting all mediated by CP and LE. Finally, Complex System (CxSys ) thinking,  setting up the vaster background of unlimited processes going on in our universe. We use our brain processes therefore, largely visually, but also by logics and maths, to process and model the processes in the universe. That is a major  secret to making unified models. Visual thought experiments in part, which processes events using nearly Universal processors, can unite, combine and also create and bring together the vastnesses of processes in our universe. Simply by showing the major relationships of processes in our Universe.

.
How to find those UP’s?  Very simple. To most rules there are exceptions. The Exception tests the rule. Look for those. CP, LE, T&E, sorting methods, and S/F and CxSys have very few exceptions and are almost universally applicable. By their exceptions, we will know them as not universal enough….  How many exceptions to the cell model for living systems do we find?  Very, very few. Thus the Cell model is a UP in biology.
As Ulam so wisely stated and was ignored, 70 years ago, Math must greatly advance before it can describe complex systems. 

.
https://jochesh00.wordpress.com/2014/09/03/beyond-the-absolute-limits-to-knowledge/

.

Godel’s Incompleteness Theorem (oft euphemized to Godel’s Proof) is yet another way of showing these logical incompletenesses in current methods & systems. & again, missed.

.
The S-curves of Growth are part and parcel of a beginning to do this. Showing the origins of mathematics coming from verbal description is very clear. S-curves are very nearly highly adjustable, limitless universal processors of events.  UP are the case. Anatomically, Math is processed right next to or even interdigitating with the Speech cortex in the left Temporal  area & L Hemisphere.

.
https://jochesh00.wordpress.com/2019/09/10/the-s-curves-of-growth/

.

.

Part and parcel of our limits are the Idealists & their idealisms, which are terribly anti-empirical and also very limited, too. These do ignore CxSys, as does Feynman re’ Biology and QM, Hawking in the “Grand Design ” limits to physics, and many others. & the incompletenesses of physics in Bell and QM, as well.  In biology we cannot show much progress until we then better describe, model & understand CxSys. We use Universal brain processes to model Events in Process in the universe. A neat symmetry. Processes visual model/describe events in process.

.


.https://jochesh00.wordpress.com/2015/09/08/explandum-6-understanding-complex-systems/

.

.These unseen patterns & findings are very common in our languages. Sadly, Linguistics is not a science. but by adding in LE methods and analysis, we begin to do that to language. And we learn a great deal from comparative linguistics. There is the CP once more. Using that we can simply find a great many, well hidden, and well taken for granted patterns in the language, esp. English, which have been missed. The CP is a great creator of info, and a UP of considerable capabilities.


.Let’s ask a big question. Why is English so widely spoken world wide? Are there any good reasons for that, other than the UK ran and controlled about 1/3 of the world’s land surface and Ruled the Waves? After the bankruptcies of WW2 in England, the US, another English speaking system, took over and then largely ran things widely, and was highly efficient & innovative, too.
.Are there any advantages, then to speaking English compared to the other languages in the Western world? The answer is a very surprising yes, very likely.  And this is once again, LE, CP and comparative linguistics.  We note this vast trend. The words we use the most often are also those which are the shortest having the fewest letters as well; & as easily pronounced & written because of the fewest sounds/letters. Thus one, two, three, four, five, six up to the next 4 digits in 10, which is the decimal system base. Again, the verb to be, has forms: is, are, was, were, be, and so forth. Very short, very easy to use often, and quite, quite time, ink, and pronunciation efficient. LE yet again. 2nd Law. 

;


.Esperanto failed because it lacked those efficiencies. The made up words were not very linked, and were very long words. Meaning any language, which is not LE efficient by using shorter words as the most frequently used, will be not efficient as English is, relative to those which do not. Language is efficient, or else. And any short word savings gain time, energy, storage space, again & again, until they pay for themselves. So if we want to construct a new language, it must be very LE efficient as possible.

;
.Now let’s look at the English nouns and compare & contrast those with the romance languages, the other germanic language, and others. In Romance language, Portufuese , Espagnol, Francais, Italiano, etc., all of the nouns have gender. And those nouns also must have gender related articles, as well as the adjectival forms must match/reflect that gender. That is a lot of extra processing time, is it not? Even German has gender for nouns, too. Ever more, if we take  a usual phrase and very similar in meaning sentence in English, and compare it to the Deutsch, we see at once the German is lots longer. An Englischen efficiency, is not?

.
Now, compared to the others, with nouns having gender, irrespective of their biological sex, English does not do that. Only animals are given generally sex. And we have special names for the Ewes,& Rams, the Mares & Sires, the sires & bitches, do we not?  But for windows, doors, ports, and most other nouns outside of animals, English has no feminine, masculine, or neuter articles, nor genders, nor adjectival forms which have to be matched up with the noun genders. Even some verbs have gender, too.
.Who has seen this before and realized what it means in terms of the some 10K’s of nouns we use every day when speaking English? We are free of that. English is thus highly efficient compared to the Romance languages, and those which have nouns with fem., masc. or neuter genders. English saves LOTS of time every day in every speaker, relatively to that simplicity, does it not?

.
.When we look at Mandarin we see much the same. Only biological gender, and the rest rarely genders in the nouns, either. That is a very clear cut Chinese efficiency. Very close to what’s found in English. Once instance is guiding. Two major examples are nearly proving.

.
.Again, hidden in our languages are the efficiencies of English, unseen, unspoken of, just like as above with the linearities and false dualities and not recognized characteristics of those, either. 

.
.Our dictionaries likewise hold vast amounts of com- words, based upon the Latin, Cum. Unseen, and in the midst of all of those vast variations, are Compare, comparison, with which our brains process, recognize, create information, and organize the hierarchies of our information. Most all of it, Missed, again.

.
And there that is for all to see, what was hidden before in the rich complexities of the com- words, The word, Comparison, which does most all the work in higher brain functions. Now seen for what it likely is in most cases. Hidden just like the efficiencies and the unnecessary excesses of noun genders has been for 1000’s of years, very likely. Too.
.Or the near absolute patterns of the primes missed for 2300 years for that matter.

.

.
.https://jochesh00.wordpress.com/2020/05/26/how-to-find-primes-anywhere-in-the-number-lline-fast-efficiently-no-matter-how-large/

.

.The richness of this system of CP, LE, S/F, process thinking, and CxSys is unlimited. It can create crativities in most all fields without limits. It can explore and describe & create new findings, and newer discoveries. For instance if events were deterministic,  instead of probabilities, there would not be that richness there in this universe very likely to create all of the possibilities of living systems, and all else. It would be too simple to work.  But because the probabilities of QM become the possibilities of events without limits, nearly, then most all we can think of becomes possible.

.
.And the CP puts events back together, organizes them into a richer understanding of what’s going on. It shows that QM is CxSys, at least, with the kinds of nuclear combinations and all of the rich electronic levels those create. Because we describe CxSys with probabilities, it also shows that QM is an early mathematized form of CxSys mathematics. And that the world of quantum events is thusly CxSys, too, because the probabilities rule in most all CxSys’ such as weather, plate tectonics, the interactions of the planets in large planetary solar systems, & so forth, including living systems, all CxSys. So QM is very likely a form of CxSys as well, and is thus understood better.

.

It’s a unifying system made possible because of far more universal processors. The brain processors model processes of events in existence. And those rich confluences are the beauties of new discoveries and understandings unlimitedly possible in this system. The comparison processing puts together the incoherent mess of breaking down most all events into their parts. CP is a powerful tool, highly capable of creating unification and universal understanding, very likely.

.
.That’s the promise here. Which has been ignored, avoided, and missed for 1000’s of years. Yet the complexity of events and types, including the normal variations on the theme of a species, genetics, is quintessentially, CxSys. 
.What is information and knowledge, and how do we create those? How do we create language, and creativities? How do we generate mathematics?  All of these deep questions are to be greatly, altho not completely described, but explained & solved here in major ways. And it will most all of it be self evident, too.

.
.Have written a number of times before of the essential elements of the categoria which basically describe the aspects of this new model of brain functions, being how we think, what creates information, what then creates creativities without limits from those creations, and how we organize that information into the hierarchies of our understanding, first done magnificently by Aristoteles. He knew it worked, but did not understand how it worked. Basically a major discovery about information and knowledge, but not as well understood until today what we know about information & how it’s created, processed and stored in the cortex, largely.
.”How Physicians create Information”, details this; A cameo of how most all informations in our cortices are created and imported from outside events into our brains.

.
.https://jochesh00.wordpress.com/2017/05/01/how-physicians-create-new-information/

.

.The first key is comprehending Least Energy (LE) in all its rich comparison processing (CP) forms. Essentially the Complex System (CxSys) of brain structures & functions (S/F).

.
.Complex system of the 2nd Law here:

.https://jochesh00.wordpress.com/2017/04/22/the-complex-system-of-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics/

.

.Once we understand that CxSys are best understood by least energy (LE) rules, based upon ThermoDynamics, then we have found another great, universal processor, one of many to be introduced here, and go from there. From those universal processors, which Karl Friston has highly formalized into an understanding of brain higher information functions, we can build from there.  

.
James Hamilton, the great Irish mathematician, ca. 1800, called by other names, least actions, as well. The minimalist principle, and many other forms of it. Least free energy being a highly mathematized abstraction, and not easily applied as is the LE rule & form,s of it, here.And then we must figure out The universal processors, and how those come about, and what drives their creations and sustains their usefulnesses.  

.
.And then the massive S/F relationships, again, which are nearly universal.

.
.The near universal processor of biology is very structural, that is the anatomy at the core of biology.  The Cell is The basic universal processor of biology, is it not? Sitting there for centuries, using it, and not realized, and missing once again, why the cell concept works. It universally applies to all life, does it not? Bingo. Hiding there all this time, a universal structural processor of biology.  And cells have both structure which implies their functions, and vice  versa. Unlimited creator of information BTW. The most vast Universal Processor in biology.

.
Universal social processors? Simple and obvious too, and missed, for 1000’s of years, those simply stated 2K years ago, by Yeshua, of course.

.
We have the ways which we are taught, the wise sayings, the aphorisms, the adages, the words of wisdom, the Proverbs, and the rich categoria found in Poor/RICHard’s Almanac. Most of those are in fact, short cuts, efficient ways of dealing with day to day problems, which have been created to solve important questions. & to efficiently guide our actions daily. They are efficient, process a great deal of info very succinctly and can be nearly universally used most of the time, to efficiently, LE sort out our problems.  That is, make decisions. More nearly medium grade to universal processors.
.

https://jochesh00.wordpress.com/2020/03/11/decision-making-shopping-the-fundamentals/

.

.

.This breaks down most all decision making into simple LE methods, and rules. And thus solves most of the problems regarding decision making, including why it can be so hard to make good decisions. Operating in Complex systems, in short.

.
.*Brain and most all processes/events in existence highly follow least energy rules. Friston has proven this beyond much doubt operating in brain. So it’s very likely the case.  But it has many forms, least time, as a special case, because time cannot be created, begged, borrowed or stored up. Once it’s gone, then it’s gone forever. We can save lots of time and then use that for more work, than we’d have done before. Or we can have others do our work for us, but we must pay a price for that, so it doesn’t come cheaply. and involves complicated work and employment relationships which are CxSys, too. Machines, too, can solve problems faster and do tasks faster.
.With word processors we can write, print out, store and publish, perhaps 20-30 times faster than mere keyboards typing on paper. AGAIN, LE efficiencies in practice and action. TD rules of least energy. Which is easily why those were created, and have largely through phenomenal growth replaced typewriters.


LE creates growth of all sorts, simply and efficiently: Evolution, Growth , Development article:

.
.https://jochesh00.wordpress.com/2015/09/01/evolution-growth-development-a-deeper-understanding/

.

.

.So we have the LE working. But HOW do we detect least energy forms? And that is simply solved by doing a Comparison Process (CP) among the choices we have settled on for testing. We sort them out by CP of those to each other. Some will not be least energy, and require lots of time. Least energy,costs, and availabilities of metals and materials, do that, too.  But generally, if we are observing  which antibiotics to use for example, or which materials to use to make an electric light, we are widely and nearly universally constrained by LE rules.

.
.Does the antibiotic have lots of bad systemic effects? Then it’s out. Does it have a high cost? Out. Does the patient have an allergy to it? Out. Does it work effectively and have a good deal of actions to kill the bacterial strain? Yes, then it’s in, the other problems being the same.  So we are thus Sorting out by CP among the CxSys decision making going on here. Essentially, decision making, and using LE to sort out by CP which means gives the best outcomes, for the least costs, times, problems, and highest effectiveness with the microbe strain.

.
.Thus, we have yet another method here, sorting by trial and error (T&E). We’ve often used that antibiotic a fair amount, & we know largely that it’s effective. So of the 6 we are looking at, that works best in this case. And it’s the most life saving, efficient, least energy solution to the choice. So we see at once, that testing, checking, and the vast compendia of info about antibiotics, we have, all guide us to that LE rule, which one to use. Again, universal processors: sorting the Wheat from the Chaff. There it is again.

.
.Outcomes work, that is what are the fruits of using this antibiotic is the case here. By comparing outcomes of what we do, the materials we use, etc., we create knowledge and Information. Yet another part of least energy. Outcomes are done by CP as well.  So that sorting process, even of coins, involves comparing the coins, organizing by CP to groups of cents, nickels, dimes, and quarters, and then counting out what we have, and storing those efficiently in coin wrappers.  Sorting is most all done by CP as well.

.

.According to types, according to repeated calls to long term memories, which are also stored by LE rules, viz. how the words sound. Sound alikes is LTM storage, LE rule. It’s first used and the primary LTM storage method. Easily seen & reported by Hofstadter and have discussed that rule at length.

.
.https://jochesh00.wordpress.com/2019/07/13/towards-a-model-of-everything-moe/

.
.So, now we have the antibiotics or the structures, and choose methods to use by T& E found by CP, LE, and good outcomes work, all mediated by CP at every stage. Then we try it out to see how it works compared to our goals of fast, effective, least cost/energy cure.  & most often it works, depending upon how good, reliable our memories are.

.
.Thus, we have by comparison process, LE driving the Method of  Comparison, Actually  Methods of comparison, hierarchies, not linear descriptions, but the multiplicit Categoria of Aristoteles, discussed  above, too.

.
.Decisions made, and we test and check, and observe and find out how well that works. It does, and so we need go no further. Or it doesn’t and we repeat the CP process, the sorting, the LE rule driven methods once again.
.Now we have LE guidance to CP sorting in decision makings, and the elements of those CxSys decision making rules, as well. That’s a huge aspect of our compendium of understanding, too.

.
.Also, we have a group of 1st choice, near universal processors to look at. and find more without limits. Universal processors which we largely use to derive most of our decision making. LE detected and used by CP. Sorting, T&E method, all driven by same.  But what are the other universal processors (UP)? & they are all of them energy efficient, following Ockham’s Razor, another UP for the best outcomes, the best goals of what we are doing. Cearly.

.
.LE, CP, T&E are those we have so far. But in all of their near limitless variations and types used. The others are S./F relationships, and those are also using LE and CP to work. We compare, for understanding how molecules work by the structure of a molecule to its outcomes. And once we learn enough we can design newer antibiotics on these basis, & by comparing structure to function outcomes  (& Function back to Structure), find out which work the best. ie. Which match our goals best. So S/F is yet another universal processor in biology, pharma, and in figuring out how brain works. And much else.

.
There is one other which lies behind most of the sciences, and our day to day personal use. By its outcomes (fruits) we will know it. By how it saves lives by antibiotics, by how the metals, plastics, etc.  and structures/devices they are made of work, and virtually all else of our medical methods,  technological and scientific knowledge is based upon Observing the empirical outcomes of what we do, Truly, by its outcomes we will know whether and how well those work. Yet another vast, universal processor.

.

Essentially widely used by brains of all kinds, but until here, not formally described, elucidated, explained, and apparent.  Just like the efficiencies of English were missed. Just like the Depths Within Depths and the patterns of the Primes have been missed, too.  For 1000’s of years…..

.
.https://jochesh00.wordpress.com/2014/04/14/depths-within-depths-the-nested-great-mysteries/

.

.

.When we see a patient with brain injury, where functions such as speech or movement are affected we know by T&E testing, which structures and where in brain which create speech impairments. The Left post temporal area brain is where the basic language grammar, sequencing of words and so forth is done. Because when that area is damaged, we get characteristic defining loss of grammar, etc., there. If widely damaged, mathematics is also damaged, too.  S/F again. So we do an MRI or quick CT, and compare that to what is normal to read it. This confirms the S/F once again. And it’s done unlimitedly every day in major medical centers world wide. Called reading the images. Yet another of the 100’s of forms of CP. All of Which creates information useful to our treatments and survivals.

.
.Any other universal processors of import? Yes, biological, surface area phenomena. That essentially the size of the particle to be processed, absorbed and otherwise treated has everything to do with absorption. And the absorbing structures upon which they rely, also influence how fast, efficiently they work.

.


.For instance, the lung air sacs, and the villi in the small intestine, plus the haustra of large colon are surface area structures.  The very tiny alveoli are the end points of the trachea, the two main bronchi, the bronchioles and finally down to the air sacs. Hierarchically described at every size, we see. Those effectively give the lungs about 1/2 football field size of area to give up CO2, take on O2, and humidify the air. One example.

.
.Next is that of villi, which are very tiny hair like  cells, which absorb a huge amount of nutrients etc., from the inner linings of the small intestine, again with a vast surface area, like unto part of a football field, all held within our small intestines.

.


.Again, if we chew up food with teeth, it reduces the surface areas of the food particles, occ. to powders. (why pills are made of powders, BTW, to max out absorption) Then the stomach makes the food even smaller mechanically as well by acids, and enzymes. Again, Surface area phenomena. Another near UP.

.
.Finally, we look at hairs as a complex system. Hairs of keratin have about 20 uses in the body, and keratin is also a near universal structural compound, like chitin, cellulose, and many others. Stable, efficient, least energy as well.  Near universal building substances, viz. Hair can protect by retaining heat for most mammals. It also coats the shoulders and head to provide sun protections. It also acts as emitters of pheromones. Because those are important  in terms of behaviors, the very high surface areas of the skinny hairs in the groin, crotch, and other areas in humans, act to very quickly evaporate water, and thus cooling. But also to release pheromones important in most mammals.  It’s an efficiency principle, surface area phenomena, as well, and thus shows how structures of the body show LE efficiencies in multiple ways, too.

.
.Hairs on our heads, shoulders and arms protects from sunburn and skin cancers. And now that we have clothing, we need fur less. and with hats, we can tolerate baldness, as well.

.
.Hairs in the cochlea give us hearing. Hairs there also give us balance in the Vestibular system. Hair of the eyebrows keep sweat and rain out, and also protect eyes from dust and other things getting into our eyes. Eyelashes not only protect, but have an immediate local connection to create the protecting eye blinks, too. More Functions, 1 simple structure. Hairs in the nose, and ears also protect those orifices. Hair on the chins, keeps our human chins, which other mammals do not have, protected and keep it warm, as well. That keeps the base of the tongue necessary for speh, from freezing, too.

.
.Fur on the throats keeps the vocal cords of the larynx protected from cold and freezing, as well. Again universally found structures, which are types of universal processors and so forth. Does a LOT with a little, thus LE, TD efficiencies which shows physics operating universally in our biologies & bodies. and those of the other animals and plants as well. Which all have their forms of hairs, too. & doing a lot with a simple hair, is the very essence, the very basis of least energy efficiencies of CxSys.

.
.Thus Universal processors, processes & structural events are all of a type. Do a lot with a little, again. These are the minimalist, and widely known, and now better understood, by CP, LE methods.  And how everything is related to most everything else, too.

.
.Universal processors created universal events everywhere. A rich panoply of CxSys, as well. Simply detected, described, and created by CP & LE. Missed for 1000’s of years, but still here and getting better, too. In creation, in evolution, history and in the markets and other forms of growth and development without limits.

.
.To simplify, IOW (abrev. are LE, efficient), in order to model the universe of events we can use universal processors to create unified understanding of most everything, too. This vast insight has been missed.  Just like the absolute pattern of the primes and where to find them specifically no matter how large the number,,,,,,

.
.https://jochesh00.wordpress.com/2017/05/01/how-physicians-create-new-information/

.

.

.And that tells us if we are right or wrong, and if there are other events going on such as bleeds, trauma,  infections, and related. All of which can look at arterial damage, &  related. Will not go into the complicated differential but to say it’s S/F related, CP all. & reading the entire rich panoply of Images is all CP related, too. Comparing S/F is the basis of understanding how brain works, & how we Diagnose, and how we read most all images. CP those findings to normal, in all its complexities. Again, S/F as universal processors of information.

.


.In the body, the movements of the lips &  much else is also S/F related, Kinesiology is not only how the bones, joints, muscle, tendons and ligaments work, but is also how the info is stored in the Motor and Sensory systems, too.  Kinesiology shows us how the brain knows in the motor and sensory strips how to perform skilled actions as well. It shows and knows the limits of the joint movements, and where the body parts are, as well, relative to the others. And it’s all S/F discernible, too.When we see the inferior motor strip damage it mostly involves a body part in the upper body and the opposite side. Simply flex the joints or extend them and we have the landmarks the sensory motor systems use to figure out where the body parts are. It’s that simple. Kinesiological knowledge is how the Motor/sensory relationships are set up and used as landmarks.

.
.The basic revolution in understanding brain anatomy and how it works, is S/F as well. In all its rich panoplies of CxSys outputs.

.
.https://jochesh00.wordpress.com/2014/03/04/comparison-process-explananda-pt-3/

.
.So we do that as well. It shows us this richly rewarding simplicity of HOW the brains in humans, and the great apes and all the rest of normal mammals are structured. Upside down and right reversed for left, according to the double convex lens images on the retina or equivalents.
.Right left reversed in brain, and upside down is the simple organizing rule of brain anatomy. This simple rule fixes the anatomy of the brain in most all humans, & animals, even into the leggy fish via the birds, reptiles and amphibs, too. It’s rich complexity comes down simply to Reverse left for right, and vice versa, and upside down. Following the image on the retinas from the double convex lenses, which do this. Thus a revolution in anatomy of the brain is seen, and this impels us to know a lot about brains, and thus have with this simple rule, see a lot more.

.
.Thus a revolution in brain organization propels a structural revolution in understanding how S/F is created in brain. This is not an accident, but S/F becomes a clear, near universal info processor, simply by this alone. We can use it to understand understanding without limits.

.
.Now then we have the structural reformation & a revolution, too, in brain/nervous system functions, behaviors & operations. The functions are thus also strongly implied, because of S/F. For every function there is structure, and vice versa, tho they can often be CxSys and then structures implies functions and vice versa. It’s not simple, linear but a modular, CxSys which describes the brain. Cognitive Neuroscience, by Gazzaniga, who saw that deep, rich pattern first.

.
.And thus we make the transition from linear tools to S/F which is widely used, to Cx/Sys rules. HAve defined those before by unlimited examples and will only cite this article for reference, as amn not going reinvent the wheel once again.

.
.Soi, thus we have the compendium of our understanding, built up by CP, detecting least energy configuration, and then S/F creating the information, and the rest. But we are missing a few more essential elements in our Categoria of understanding.

.
.Clearly, how do we organize this information?  The Kategoria of the Hierarchies, of Aristoteles. Info is widely hierarchically organized according to the same or very similar types, again, modeluatle and created by C{ of types. and these create the rich types, which fit into each category of ,kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species, and variations.

.
.Hierarchical organizations also created by CP. So we have that rich means, again simplified. The functions are simply CP driven again. CP does a lot with a little.

.
.Where does creativity come from? Where does understanding come from? Solved already. The relationships among events is what creates understanding, wrote Einstein, in “Reality and Physics”, 1936. CF.  Thusly, too, E is related to mass, M mby  MCsq. That in a nutshell is how we take specific facts, elements and understand the larger picture.


.But how do we do that? Create kategoria. We create them by mixing, matching comparison processing. It’s all organized richly by LE guidance of CP. That gives us understanding of how everything in the universe is likely related to all else. The rich interconnections of the universe, make it possible to relate/connect all to all else. 

.
.The rules of QM, relativity/Newton, and thermodynamics, TD are all the same, over time &  spaces back to 13-14 B years, and across 13-14 B light years, and in all spaces and times in between. See Depths within Depths, and Explananda 5 for the solid evidences of this.

.


.Once again, CP with LE driven guidance largely organize this information, too. Self organization by LE driven processes.  Where do development, evolution and market forces come from?

.


.Skimple LE driven processes. Very simple. & the least energy brain Structure/Functions are also driven by LE processes. & thus brain processing describes UP’s, too.

.


.Any more UPs? Yes, a rich panoply and not the time to recite all of them., See the basic types already given. But the social UPs are there too. There is but one universe, or God Equivalent to which all must be subjected. That sets the basic structure. A higher power, the universe of events, bearing a clear relationship to some aspects of God, therefore.

.
.& the next? Do to others. The rich panoplies of the silver rule to Hillel’s rule, the behaviors of a positive & negative reward system by Jeshua ben Joseph addressed already. The rule of LE is do to others, positive, and creates growth, and shows that not to do rules as well. It creates the laws, rules of living, the morals that by their outcomes. If evil results, it’s wrong. If survival is short term & reduces life, then it’s wrong. If it creates more life and good outcomes of survival, then it’s moral to do so. Thus ethics and morals become least energy, scientifically . And lots more amenable to scientific testing.  it’s comprehensive and comprehensible. LE rules, as a UP of moral activities.

.


.Or to put it in brief, A patient said to the medico, If I move my head This way it hurts. Said the wise doc, Then don’t do that!!  That’s good and bad outcomes, and by their fruits we will know them, in a nutshell. Don’t do it if it damages you, and do it if it creates good, survival and living outcomes.  The Moral imperative of Biological survival at work,  again another UP, compared to the rules of living, by other UP’s, CP, LE, and by their outcomes you will know them by CP. And the rules and laws are also read by using CP and obeying them by same unlimited CP driven UP in brain.

.
.Then all of the methods, ways of doing things, approaches, and rules, standards, which create the techniques, and technologies, the tools , devices, and physical aspects of the basic systems used. Thus, the rich compendium of our understanding is widely simplified down.


.LE rules, guidance. Detected by  CP.  We find Least energy outcomes using CP of the outcomes.

.
.Extended by sorting &  observing, T&E, Sorting, being UP’s. Then Process thinking using the universal processors. And S/F rules which are also created by comparing S to F, and vice versa. & the knowledge thus created organized by CP into the rich, unlimited Hierarchies of our understanding.
.

.And finally, what of creativity? Clearly, it’s there too, Comparing S/F created nearly universals, another UP, information of all kinds, most all info is created by doing so, and then hierarchically organized by another CP driven creativity into our understanding of how events relate, by comparing the one to the others. Creating information by CP creates the rest of the creativity in most all fields, in most cases.

.
.But with this TD guide and limits. There is no perfect heat engine, There is thus NO perfect description, too, or much else which can do everything. A lot likely. but not all. Thus there are no absolutes and the rich empirical findings finally deal the death blow to the pagan, idealistic, mind centered beliefs, of absolute space/time, perfection, determinisms, ultimates, finalities & certainties,

.
.& results inevitably in rich probabilities of QM and outcomes of most all CxSys in which we occ. find stabilities which give us understanding, using CP, LE rules. Thus we can be limited and nothing but, but the beauty of these system is the universe is so big &  our brains/minds so small, that almost anything we want to do,w e can find a way, if we will only do the work to find the relationships which give us the details to begin to create better &  better ways of doing most everything.

.
.Problem solving is then largely, but not quite solved. as there is NO perfect heat energin, model, nor system, nor tool or device either. Which means unending room for growth, development and richness in most all things.

.
.But not quite.,… The brain limits are built into TD, and much of what we do, But not quite permanent limits, either. Always another S-curve of growth to create, always new ways to look at events  more efficiently, & do more with less, and thus grow, develop and succeed.
.

.

https://jochesh00.wordpress.com/2014/04/14/depths-within-depths-the-nested-great-mysteries/

.

.

.https://jochesh00.wordpress.com/2015/09/01/evolution-growth-development-a-deeper-understanding/

.

.This is the rich compendium of this new model and what it portends, for most all persons in almost all fields. Allowing the rich connections of these methods to create new, understanding, new sciences in most every field. No longer unable to comprehend the arts & humanities, but both interconnected in rich panoplies of the hierarchies of our understanding. Now created by the UPs (but not quite)  as discussed  above and how everything is most likely related to almost all else, in our universe.

.
.We must therefore mention that great opposer of the sciences and empirical , Feyerabend of the Vienna school. He stated that there was no objective science. And he was right. But he looked for ultimate absolutes, which do not either exist. Einstein’s epistemology showed there was no absolute space and time, because of no absolute measurement, All standards for measuring are relative, and thus not final. 

.

Einstein’s last criticism of QM was that it was true, but NOT complete. And from there we have started again here. There is also no absolute, perfect heat engine. We cannot arrive there. There is thus no absolute, nor perfect description , and thus no final, ultimate models, either. Having extended and thus conjoined TD and relativity of physics, we arrive at a fully new path to take. Having jettisoned the idealisms, and finalities, we are left with the probabilities of events in existence. And those probabilities  likely create unlimited very likely possibilities to extend our models, very likely without limits. Feyerabend was both wrong & right. But he missed the possibilities of endless improvements, however. Einstein might have had some idea, but he did not want to take on the dragon of knowledge, descriptions and language not being absolute either.

,
.Because the limit’ to our knowledge are there because of limits to our measurements. and our descriptions being CP are also limited, and incomplete, we have within our grasp endless improvements and advances, beyond our limits, at present.

,
.Empiricisms work, and we have created a massive techno civilization which extends our lives, improves them, and makes life far more worth living. People now live twice as long as 100 years ago, or so. And that we now see can be extended without limits into the future, if we are willing to do the work.

,
.But not quite….. Always more room for growth, and unending creativities, as clearly and likely shown above.

,
.The  is the Compendium of most all knowledge, now, with Universal Processors. UP’s we see.& there it is.

,
.But not quite…..  grin.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s